Legislature(1995 - 1996)
1996-04-01 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1996-04-01 House Journal Page 3511 HB 341 Representative Kubina brought up reconsideration of the vote on CSHB341(FIN) (page 3487). The following was again before the House in third reading: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 341(FIN) An Act relating to administrative adjudication and judicial appeals and to the informal resolution of certain factual disputes between taxpayers and the Department of Revenue; establishing the office of tax appeals as a quasi-judicial agency in the Department of Administration; revising the procedures for hearing certain tax appeals, including appeals regarding seafood marketing assessments; relating to consideration and determination by the superior court of disputes involving certain taxes and penalties due, and amending provisions relating to the assessment, levy, and collection of taxes and penalties by the state and to the tax liability of taxpayers; providing for the release of agency records relating to formal administrative tax appeals; relating to litigation disclosure of public records; clarifying administrative subpoena power in certain tax matters; and providing for an effective date. Representative Brown placed a call of the House. 1996-04-01 House Journal Page 3512 HB 341 **The presence of Representatives Moses and Navarre was noted. The call was satisfied. The question to be reconsidered: Shall CSHB 341(FIN) pass the House? The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 341(FIN)--RECONSIDERATION Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 29 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Brice, Bunde, B.Davis, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Ivan, James, Kohring, Kott, Long, Mackie, Martin, Masek, Moses, Mulder, Ogan, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Rokeberg, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Vezey, Williams Nays: Brown, Davies, Elton, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Kelly, Kubina, Navarre, Nicholia, Robinson, Willis And so, CSHB 341(FIN) passed the House on reconsideration. Representative Vezey moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 341(FIN) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.